C++26 Safety Features Won’t Save You (And the Committee Knows It)
Summary
The post critically assesses C++26 safety features and argues they won't fully address memory-safety issues at scale. It uses CrowdStrike’s 2024 incident and Google’s Android vulnerability data to argue that real-world safety improvements come from safer languages and better deployment practices, not opt-in language features. It concludes that while the features are real improvements, their impact is incremental and timelines too slow for immediate enterprise needs.