Minimal Viable Programs (2014)
Summary
Minimal Viable Programs argues that the smallest possible program solving a problem is preferable to feature-rich complexity. Using the Erlang Ticket System as an example, it shows how a simple, single-purpose tool maintained under revision control can stay valuable, while adding features often leads to unnecessary complexity and maintenance challenges. The piece culminates in a advocacy for MVP thinking, highlighting examples like Dropbox and Twitter as models of simple, focused software.